| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
03/01/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
10/01/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
YUAN, S.; LINQUIST, B. A.; WILSON, L. T.; CASSMAN, K. G.; STUART, A. M.; PEDE, V.; SAITO, K.; AGUSTIANI, N.; ARISTYA, V. E.; KRISNADI, L. Y.; ZANON, A.J.; HEINEMANN, A. B.; CARRACELAS, G.; SUBASH, N.; BRAGMANAND, P. S.; LI, T.; PENG, S.; GRASSINI, P. |
|
Afiliación : |
SHEN YUAN, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, MARA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and Technology, China.; BRUCE A. LINQUIST, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA.; LLOYD T. WILSON, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center, Beaumont, TX 77713, USA.; KENNETH G. CASSMAN, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.; ALEXANDER M. STUART, International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777 Metro Manila, Philippines.; VALERIEN PEDE, International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777 Metro Manila, Philippines.; KASUKI SAITO, Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 01 B.P. 2551, Bouake 01, Côte d’Ivoire.; NURWULAN AGUSTIANI, Indonesian Center for Rice Research, Sukamandi 41256, Indonesia.; VINA EKA ARISTYA, Assessment Institute of Agricultural Technology (AIAT) Central Java, Ungaran 50552, Indonesia.; LEONARDUS Y. KRISNADI, Assessment Institute of Agricultural Technology (AIAT) East Java, Malang 65152, Indonesia.; ALENCAR JUNIOR ZANON, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Avenida Roraima n° 1000, 97105-900 Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.; ALEXANDRE BRYAN HEINEMANN, EMBRAPA Arroz e Feijão, Zona Rural GO-462, Santo Antônio de Goiás, Goias 75375-000, Brazil.; JULIO GONZALO CARRACELAS GARRIDO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NATARAJA SUBASH, ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram 250110 Uttar Pradesh, India.; POTHULA S. BRAHMANAND, ICAR-Indian Institute of Water Management, Bhubaneswar 751023 Odisha, India.; TAO LI, Applied GeoSolutions, DNDC Applications Research and Training, Durham, NH 03824, USA; 5APPLIED GEOSOLUTIONS, DNDC APPLICATIONS RESEARCH AND TRAINING, DURHAM, NH 03824, USA, Huazhong Agriculture University (HZAU), China.; PATRICIO GRASSINI, University of Nebraska - Lincoln. |
|
Título : |
Sustainable intensification for a larger global rice bowl. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Nature Communications, December 2021, Article number 7163. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27424-z |
|
Páginas : |
11 p. |
|
DOI : |
10.1038/s41467-021-27424-z |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 7 April 2021; Accepted: 17 November 2021; Published online 09 December 2021.
Correspondence author: pgrassini2@unl.edu; speng@mail.hzau.edu.cn |
|
Contenido : |
Future rice systems must produce more grain while minimizing the negative environmental impacts. A key question is how to orient agricultural research & development (R&D) programs at national to global scales to maximize the return on investment. Here we assess yield gap and resource-use efficiency (including water, pesticides, nitrogen, labor, energy, and associated global warming potential) across 32 rice cropping systems covering half of global rice harvested area. We show that achieving high yields and high resource-use efficiencies are not conflicting goals. Most cropping systems have room for increasing yield, resource-use efficiency, or both. In aggregate, current total rice production could be increased by 32%, and excess nitrogen almost eliminated, by focusing on a relatively small number of cropping systems with either large yield gaps or poor resource-use efficiencies. This study provides essential strategic insight on yield gap and resource-use efficiency for prioritizing national
and global agricultural R&D investments to ensure adequate rice supply while minimizing negative environmental impact in coming decades. |
|
Palabras claves : |
ARROZ; INTENSIFICACIÓN DE LA AGRICULTURA; INTENSIFICACIÓN SOSTENIBLE; RICE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16177/1/Nature-Communications-Yuan-.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27424-z
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02454naa a2200409 a 4500
001 1062624
005 2022-01-10
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1038/s41467-021-27424-z$2DOI
100 1 $aYUAN, S.
245 $aSustainable intensification for a larger global rice bowl.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a11 p.
500 $aArticle history: Received: 7 April 2021; Accepted: 17 November 2021; Published online 09 December 2021. Correspondence author: pgrassini2@unl.edu; speng@mail.hzau.edu.cn
520 $aFuture rice systems must produce more grain while minimizing the negative environmental impacts. A key question is how to orient agricultural research & development (R&D) programs at national to global scales to maximize the return on investment. Here we assess yield gap and resource-use efficiency (including water, pesticides, nitrogen, labor, energy, and associated global warming potential) across 32 rice cropping systems covering half of global rice harvested area. We show that achieving high yields and high resource-use efficiencies are not conflicting goals. Most cropping systems have room for increasing yield, resource-use efficiency, or both. In aggregate, current total rice production could be increased by 32%, and excess nitrogen almost eliminated, by focusing on a relatively small number of cropping systems with either large yield gaps or poor resource-use efficiencies. This study provides essential strategic insight on yield gap and resource-use efficiency for prioritizing national and global agricultural R&D investments to ensure adequate rice supply while minimizing negative environmental impact in coming decades.
653 $aARROZ
653 $aINTENSIFICACIÓN DE LA AGRICULTURA
653 $aINTENSIFICACIÓN SOSTENIBLE
653 $aRICE
700 1 $aLINQUIST, B. A.
700 1 $aWILSON, L. T.
700 1 $aCASSMAN, K. G.
700 1 $aSTUART, A. M.
700 1 $aPEDE, V.
700 1 $aSAITO, K.
700 1 $aAGUSTIANI, N.
700 1 $aARISTYA, V. E.
700 1 $aKRISNADI, L. Y.
700 1 $aZANON, A.J.
700 1 $aHEINEMANN, A. B.
700 1 $aCARRACELAS, G.
700 1 $aSUBASH, N.
700 1 $aBRAGMANAND, P. S.
700 1 $aLI, T.
700 1 $aPENG, S.
700 1 $aGRASSINI, P.
773 $tNature Communications, December 2021, Article number 7163. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27424-z
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
06/12/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
06/12/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
DE SANTIAGO, F.; BARRIOS, M.; D'ANATRO, A.; GARCÍA, L.F.; MAILHOS, A.; POMPOZZI, G.; REHERMANN, S.; SIMÓ, M.; TESITORE, G.; DE MELLO, F.T.; VALTIERRA, V.; BLUMETTO, O. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA FERNANDA DE SANTIAGO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARGENNY BARRIOS, Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Av. Tacuarembó s/n, Entre Av. Artigas y Aparicio Saravia, Maldonado CP 20000, Uruguay; ALEJANDRO D'ANATRO, Laboratorio de Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo CP 11400, Uruguay; LUIS FERNANDO GARCÍA, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Ruta 8 km 282, Treinta y Tres CP 33000, Uruguay; ARY MAILHOS, Laboratorio de Botánica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo CP 12900, Uruguay; GABRIEL POMPOZZI, Laboratorio de Entomología, IADIZA (CCT CONICET-Mendoza), Mendoza CP 5500, Argentina; SOFÍA REHERMANN, Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Av. Tacuarembó s/n, Entre Av. Artigas y Aparicio Saravia, Maldonado CP 20000, Uruguay; MIGUEL SIMÓ, Sección Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo CP 11400, Uruguay; GIANCARLO TESITORE, Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Av. Tacuarembó s/n, Entre Av. Artigas y Aparicio Saravia, Maldonado CP 20000, Uruguay; FRANCO TEIXEIRA DE MELLO, Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Av. Tacuarembó s/n, Entre Av. Artigas y Aparicio Saravia, Maldonado CP 20000, Uruguay; VICTORIA VALTIERRA, Laboratorio de Botánica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo CP 12900, Uruguay; OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
From theory to practice: can LEAP/FAO biodiversity assessment guidelines be a useful tool for knowing the environmental status of livestock systems? |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Sustainability, 2022, Volume 14, Issue 23, e16259. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316259 |
|
ISSN : |
EISSN 2071-1050 |
|
DOI : |
10.3390/su142316259 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 6 November 2022; Revised 29 November 2022; Accepted 29 November 2022; Published 6 December 2022. -- Academic Editor: Andrea Pezzuolo. -- LICENSE: Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Biodiversity loss is a global concern, and agriculture is one of the economic sectors responsible for this impact. The assessment of ecosystems under the influence of livestock production is essential for knowing their integrity and ability to provide ecosystem services. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the application of LEAP/FAO guidelines for quantitative assessment of biodiversity in the livestock sector at the local scale (farm level) in a group of six study cases in Uruguay. A set of 20 indicators was used, including seven key thematic issues: habitat protection, habitat change, wildlife conservation, invasive species, pollution, aquatic biodiversity, off-farm feed, and landscape-scale conservation. The results show that the LEAP biodiversity assessment guidelines can be useful to characterize the state of ecosystems under pastoral use and some specific components of their biodiversity, as well as assess the interaction of the production system with the environment and plan management accordingly. This work also provides an analysis of the methodology used and recommendations to facilitate its application by the sector. The results from the application of the indicators show a great deal of wild biodiversity that uses grazing systems based on native grasslands as habitats and the acceptable integrity of these ecosystems. On average, farms have 83% of their native ecosystem, with a value of 3.5 for the Ecosystem Integrity Index. In terms of the richness of different groups, there was an average number of species of 112 herbaceous plants, 48 woody plants, 48 spiders, 150 birds, and 14 fish. The main goal of this work is to help in the wider application of the guidelines by facilitating decisions about methodology, necessary resources, and technical support. Moreover, another goal is to show the importance of native grasslands-based livestock systems for biodiversity conservation. Copyright © 2022 by the authors. MenosABSTRACT.- Biodiversity loss is a global concern, and agriculture is one of the economic sectors responsible for this impact. The assessment of ecosystems under the influence of livestock production is essential for knowing their integrity and ability to provide ecosystem services. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the application of LEAP/FAO guidelines for quantitative assessment of biodiversity in the livestock sector at the local scale (farm level) in a group of six study cases in Uruguay. A set of 20 indicators was used, including seven key thematic issues: habitat protection, habitat change, wildlife conservation, invasive species, pollution, aquatic biodiversity, off-farm feed, and landscape-scale conservation. The results show that the LEAP biodiversity assessment guidelines can be useful to characterize the state of ecosystems under pastoral use and some specific components of their biodiversity, as well as assess the interaction of the production system with the environment and plan management accordingly. This work also provides an analysis of the methodology used and recommendations to facilitate its application by the sector. The results from the application of the indicators show a great deal of wild biodiversity that uses grazing systems based on native grasslands as habitats and the acceptable integrity of these ecosystems. On average, farms have 83% of their native ecosystem, with a value of 3.5 for the Ecosystem Integrity Index. In terms of the ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA; BIODIVERSITY; GRASSLAND; LEAP guidelines; LIVESTOCK. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16907/1/sustainability-14-16259.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03461naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1063823
005 2022-12-06
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $aEISSN 2071-1050
024 7 $a10.3390/su142316259$2DOI
100 1 $aDE SANTIAGO, F.
245 $aFrom theory to practice$bcan LEAP/FAO biodiversity assessment guidelines be a useful tool for knowing the environmental status of livestock systems?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 6 November 2022; Revised 29 November 2022; Accepted 29 November 2022; Published 6 December 2022. -- Academic Editor: Andrea Pezzuolo. -- LICENSE: Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
520 $aABSTRACT.- Biodiversity loss is a global concern, and agriculture is one of the economic sectors responsible for this impact. The assessment of ecosystems under the influence of livestock production is essential for knowing their integrity and ability to provide ecosystem services. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the application of LEAP/FAO guidelines for quantitative assessment of biodiversity in the livestock sector at the local scale (farm level) in a group of six study cases in Uruguay. A set of 20 indicators was used, including seven key thematic issues: habitat protection, habitat change, wildlife conservation, invasive species, pollution, aquatic biodiversity, off-farm feed, and landscape-scale conservation. The results show that the LEAP biodiversity assessment guidelines can be useful to characterize the state of ecosystems under pastoral use and some specific components of their biodiversity, as well as assess the interaction of the production system with the environment and plan management accordingly. This work also provides an analysis of the methodology used and recommendations to facilitate its application by the sector. The results from the application of the indicators show a great deal of wild biodiversity that uses grazing systems based on native grasslands as habitats and the acceptable integrity of these ecosystems. On average, farms have 83% of their native ecosystem, with a value of 3.5 for the Ecosystem Integrity Index. In terms of the richness of different groups, there was an average number of species of 112 herbaceous plants, 48 woody plants, 48 spiders, 150 birds, and 14 fish. The main goal of this work is to help in the wider application of the guidelines by facilitating decisions about methodology, necessary resources, and technical support. Moreover, another goal is to show the importance of native grasslands-based livestock systems for biodiversity conservation. Copyright © 2022 by the authors.
653 $aÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA
653 $aBIODIVERSITY
653 $aGRASSLAND
653 $aLEAP guidelines
653 $aLIVESTOCK
700 1 $aBARRIOS, M.
700 1 $aD'ANATRO, A.
700 1 $aGARCÍA, L.F.
700 1 $aMAILHOS, A.
700 1 $aPOMPOZZI, G.
700 1 $aREHERMANN, S.
700 1 $aSIMÓ, M.
700 1 $aTESITORE, G.
700 1 $aDE MELLO, F.T.
700 1 $aVALTIERRA, V.
700 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
773 $tSustainability, 2022, Volume 14, Issue 23, e16259. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316259
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
